Heath Brown

Books

Homeschooling the Right: How Conservative Education Activism Erodes the State (2021) Columbia University Press. 

In Immigrants and Electoral Politics, Heath Brown shows why nonprofit electoral participation has emerged in relationship to new threats to immigrants, on one hand, and immigrant integration into U.S. society during a time of demographic change, on the other. Immigrants across the United States tend to register and vote at low rates, thereby limiting the political power of many of their communities. In an attempt to boost electoral participation through mobilization, some nonprofits adopt multifaceted political strategies including registering new voters, holding candidate forums, and phone banking to increase immigrant voter turnout. Other nonprofits opt to barely participate at all in electoral politics, preferring to advance the immigrant community by providing exclusively social services.

Pay-to-Play Politics: How Money Defines the American Democracy (2016) Praeger.

Everyone from Hillary Clinton to Bernie Sanders to Ted Cruz complains about the corrupting role of money and politics, but money is the lifeblood of their political survival. The public, too, deplores big money politics, despite regularly reelecting the richest candidates for office. The purpose of this book is to reconcile how—against many people's wishes—the connection between money and politics has come to define American democracy.



Examining the issue from the perspective of the public, the courts, big business, Congress, and the presidency, Heath Brown argues that money can often be harmful to the political process, but not always in ways we expect or in ways we can directly observe. More money does not necessarily guarantee electoral, legislative, or executive victories, but money does greatly change political access, opportunity, and trust. Without a nuanced understanding of the nature of the problem, future reforms will be misguided and fruitless. Pay-to-Play Politics concludes by making concrete recommendations for reform, including feasible ways to reach bipartisan consensus.

Tea Pary Divided: The Hidden Diversity of a Maturing Movement (2015) Praeger.

Since the Tea Party exploded onto the American political scene, it has matured and changed, but the differences that now exist within the movement are largely unacknowledged. A more nuanced understanding is called for. Previous treatises have sought explanations for the rise of the movement and focused primarily on its early days. This book, in contrast, focuses on understanding the diversity within the party, challenging the notion that the Tea Party is a homogeneous political movement defined mainly by its ultra-conservatism, regionalism, and rigid political orthodoxy.



To accurately depict the Tea Party as it exists today, the book explores how the party evolved from its first phase to its second, examining important distinctions in terms of who has joined and who has served in Congress and other offices. Differences in Tea Party organizations around the country are examined and their funding sources considered. The book also explores the political positions taken by Tea Party members, looking at the voting records of party legislators to see if they've adhered to stated movement objectives. Finally, and perhaps most intriguingly, the author speculates on what this all means and suggests possible futures for the diverse Tea Party strands.

You can hear a discussion of the book here: Governmentality and No Jargon

Lobbying the New President: Interests in Transition (2012) Routledge.

Presidential transitions offer the chance for new ideas, policies, and people to inhabit the White House. Transitions have triggered policy change for decades and eager interest groups have sought ways to capitalize on this often chaotic phase of US politics. President-Elect Barack Obama declared that lobbyists would be forbidden from serving his transition and issued stiff regulations and rules to limit their access to the planning for his White House. Yet even though Obama’s efforts mirror previous Presidents anti-lobbyist efforts, all Presidential transitions provide certain channels of influence, and Obama himself chose the head of a powerful and politically oriented think tank, the Center for American Progress, to run his transition. New Presidents need the information, ideas, and political capital that groups possess. Thus a curious paradox.

He was interviewed about the 2016 presidential transition on France 24:

He also was invited to deliver a lecture about presidential transitions in 2016, at Roanoke College:

Scholarly Articles

“Does Congress Still Care about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse: Yes, A Descriptive Analysis of Bills and Hearings, 1993–2016.” (2020) Public Integrity, X(x): x-x.

"What Matters More? Police or the Community for Body Worn Camera Policies.” (2020) Public Administration Quarterly. (with James Wright) 44(3): 462-482.

“How Do Policy Organizations Frame Issues and Shape Identity? Exploring the Case of School Choice.” Administration & Society, 52(7): 1038-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719884735

“The Personal is Political: Podcasting Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics (with Lilly Goren), 53(2): 322-323. doi:10.1017/S1049096519001653

“After the Punctuation: Competition, Uncertainty, and Convergent State Policy Change.” (2019) State Politics and Policy Quarterly (with Tom Holyoke), 19(1): 3-28.

"Measuring the Drapes: Why New Approaches to Money and Politics Can Address Biased Access and Influence During Presidential Transitions" Election Law Journal, 16(1) (2017).

"Immigrant-Serving Non-profit Voter Mobilization in Off-Cycle Elections: An Institutional Explanation of Differential Political Participation Patterns" Journal of Civil Society Vol 11 (4) (2015).

"Does Globalization Drive Interest Group Strategy: A Cross-national Study of Outside Lobbying and Social Media" Journal of Public Affairs (2015). DOI: 10.1002/pa.1590.

“Can Lobbying be Taught?” Interest Groups & Advocacy. (with Holyoke Tom and Tim LaPira) (2015).  4 (1): 7-24. 

“The Institutional Digital Divide: Immigrant-Serving Nonprofit Organization Adoption of Social Media.” Social Science Computer Review. (2015).  33 (2): 1-16.

"Interest Groups and Presidential Transitions" Congress and the Presidency, no.  2 (2012):  152-170.

"Shopping in the Political Arena: Strategic State and Local Venue Selection by Advocates" (with Tom Holyoke and Jeffrey Henig). State and Local Government Review44, no. 1(2012): 1-13.

 “Policy Dynamics and the Evolution of State Charter School Laws.”  (with Holyoke, Tom, Jeffrey Henig, and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet) (2009) Policy Sciences, 42: 33-50. 

 “Institutional Advocacy and Political Behavior of Charter Schools.” ( with Tom Holyoke, Jeffrey Henig,  and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet) (2007).Political Research Quarterly, 60(2): 202-214.

“Personnel Practices in U.S. Charter Schools: Extrinsic Incentives and Teacher Motivation.” Journal of School Choice, (2008) 2(4):415-439.

"Scale of Operations and Locus of Control in Market Versus Mission-Oriented Charter Schools" (with Jeffrey Henig, Tom Holyoke, and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet). Social Science Quarterly 8, no. 5 (2004): 1034-1051.